History of Environment Assessment-Free-Samples -Myassignmenthelp

Question: Evaluate the Environmental Impact Assessment System in NSW. Answer: Introduction Changes in the speed, scope and magnitude of the natural environment are determined through the level of technology available with the community. The level of interaction in between the different elements present around is relatively low. The changes incorporated by the natural environment do have a massive impact on human civilization. More significant changes are incorporated due to civilization and interaction with the environmental components (Glasson, Therivel and Chadwick, 2013). The environmental needs are absorbed by involvement in a good way. A positive reception of cultural and philosophical history provides an indulgence of EIA. At present there is no single reason for the development of modern society's rising concern for the environment. Still, the significant point is that these concerns exist, and have been compiled for managing assessment procedures (Wathern, 2013). Some legislations relating to environment has been enacted. They are focus on managing general environm ental awareness. This is important for managing the environmental aspects to gain high priority on an individual part. The consequence is that they are not compared on an equal footing with economic issues. Environment Impact Assessment is an attempt to restore the disparity. The theoretical practice of impact assessment is addressed in detail to address the ongoing environmental issues. Nevertheless, it should be remembered that the process is effective to manage the plan in a better way. Eventually, the willingness to think about the consequences of actions is undertaken for gaining impact. In other words, Environmental impact assessment ensures the environmental effectiveness. The Individuals are allowed to accept the responsibility in order to accept the effects of a proposal. They do not depend on the Regulations and bureaucracies. The report is based on EIA Improvement Project in NSW (Petts, 2009). History of Environment Impact Assessment The history of Environment Impact Assessment is linked with the US National environmental Policy Act in 1970 creating a mandatory requirement. The EIA was introduced at the state level prior before the implementation at the Common level. Every state has a divergent opinion about it. The pioneer state introducing EIA was New South Wales by issuing guidelines in State Pollution Control Commission in 1974. Australia is following the EIA at a national level through Environment Protection (Impact of Proposals) Act in 1974. At present, the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC) is prevailed in the country superseding the previous act. The commonwealth act does not put a direct impact on the law and regulations made by the state. Moreover EPBC runs as a parallel to the State/Territory Systems. Any kind of overlap in between the state and commonwealth is addressed through the bilateral agreement or any of the accreditation of the state policies and procedure (Bi swas and Agarwal, 2013). The Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 The EPBC Act provides with a legal framework to promote and protect nationally and internationally important flora, fauna, ecological communities and heritage places-defined. The act applied to the 9 matters of national interest as follows: Protection of World Heritage sites Protection of the National Heritage places RAMSAR wetlands of global importance Listing threatened species and ecological communities Protection of Migratory species under the international agreements To protect The Commonwealth marine environment Nuclear actions National Heritage To protect the Water resources, in order to develop the coal and mining development (Morgan, 2012). Environmental Impact Assessment Improvement Project (NSW) In addition to the act, it requires to streamline the national interest assessment and approval process and activities. In New South Wales, the Environment Planning Assessment Act 1979 set up three pathways for EIA. The first Part 5.1 of the EPAA provides 'State Significant Infrastructure' projects From June 2011, replacing the previous part 3A form. The second Part 4 of the Act deals with the development and control. Those projects that do not require approval under Part 3A or Part 4 are captured by the third pathway (Middle and Middle, 2010). Lastly, Part 5 deals with the environment impact assessment. The communities are largely concern about novel development taking place in the surrounding. EIA in New South Wales help in managing the environmental value. This at the same time helps in managing the different issues related to the environment. It is providing with a wider community option while managing the Department in order to address in reaching decision on the planning applic ation (Environmental Impact Assessments, 2017). The Department helps in managing the aspect in relation to the State significant project prior to development of the proposal before the Minister for Planning or the Ministers delegate. This is significant from the point of view of putting forward the different aspect in relation to the planning and development. This will help in managing the information through Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) while considering feedback from government agencies and the community (Jordan and Lenschow, 2009). Process Of Project Implementation EIA is an important format that helps in managing a noteworthy part from the point of view of State significant development (SSD) and State significant infrastructure (SSI) proposals. This help in managing the environmental, social and economic impacts while considering the factors. It includes project development and setting terms of reference for the EIS through Secretarys Environmental Assessment Requirements (SEARs). The public exhibition of the EIS reception of obedience reacts to submissions evaluation of the project by the Department determination of the project by the Minister. This is important for managing compliance in order to build and operate effective function (Environmental Impact Assessment Improvement Project. 2017). This helps in managing the resources in the best possible way. NSW advances toward the EIA and the other jurisdictions in Australia and abroad. These issues are raised by the community and other stakeholders in order to seek the improvements. For gaining competency, it is helpful in creating a consistent framework in order to ensure growth and development. It is important for managing the resources while engaging with the community and other stakeholders in order to manage the quality. This is helpful in provide a standard framework for setting conditions for the construction and operation of projects. It is providing a better quality in on the approved project to improve post-approval compliance. This is important from increase accountability for the practice of EIA professionals. These will give further direction on moving toward to growing impact assessment and professional practice (Environmental Impact Assessment Improvement Project - Community feedback. 2017). Thus it is necess ary for managing the overall environment assessment in order to manage the facts. The NSW Government is proposing changes to the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000 in order to take initiative. The Other initiatives are linked in improving EIA that include Legislative updates concerning modifying Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (Lehmann and Joseph, 2015). Environmental Impact Assessments has created its own industry while consulting firms, Legal firms have to create income and employment at their own expenses. The NSW Governments Discussion Paper in order to manage the environmental aspect. This is an important aspect in dealing with EIA professionals10 in order to recognize various environmental approvals in order to sustain in the industry. The University of NSW has incorporated a course devoted to Environmental Impact Assessment (Reed, 2008). This is important from then point of view of developing an insight. People involved in the development of groups are directly involved in EIAs in order to carry out a rigorous assessment processes in order to carry out the scientific studies in a well-informed way. This has direct potential environmental impacts on the community in order to gain a long-term insight. These are self-serving arguments from the point of view of receiving the benefits of the process without incurring costs. Majorit y of the resources used in the development of EIAs are employed productively in the economy. On the other side EIAs are used by green groups to stop development (Mitchell, 2013). Environmental Impact Assessments ultimately causes a pressure on political party in order to seek project approval. Majority of project are disrupted causing an extreme pressure on the Government bodies in carrying out the objective. The intention is to manage government assessment processes to stop the big project development as provided by the green groups in restricting the Coal Export Boom strategy document.12. The document thereby targeting of seven major projects in New South Wales. One of the critical aspects is to manage the priority from the critical projects to slow down in the endorsement procedure. Moreover, the strategy is to fundamentally disturb and delay key projects and infrastructure. This is important from managing the restricted resources in order to gain distinct results appropriately. It is not in agreement with high-quality public strategy for ideologically motivating groups in order to insert approvals process, chiefly with the appropriate challenge in Ministerial endorsement of projects in court. This is important from the point of view of managing costs of legal challenges, and green groups that is made under federal environmental law (Darnall, Henriques and Sadorsky, 2008). The cost related to the EIS is borne by the proponents under the consultation of independent proponents. This works efficiently under the guidance of the governing body. It helps in managing the concern n an effective way by culminating the ill-impacts associated with a project. The concept of EIA considers both the direct and carminative impact in order to deal with long awaiting effects. The decision making structure and rhea institutional value has to undergo a cooperative and regional decision making in order to encourage use of bio-regional approach. The goal of EIS is to clearly state whether the decision related to a project is proponent to the concept. On a long run, the site specific effects and scope has an impact on managing the issues related to the development of the resources. Public participation has a major influence on the result on a long run. A public inquiry is necessary for managing the issues in the best possible way. Any procedural challenges faced under the EI S are affected by the constraints while creating an opportunity in order to manage the concern in an appropriate way. The degraded environment has a direct constraint in order to manage the opportunity to manage the new implication. The proponents are disallowed to evade responsibility for environmental care by transferring EIS to an Environmental Management Plan (Gregory et al 2012). This is to manage the relative outcomes while monitoring adequate baseline studies with post-decision observation and auditing. This includes penalties for non-compliance of the act done under the EIA. A positive reception of cultural and philosophical history provides an indulgence of EIA. At present there is no single reason for the development of modern society's rising concern for the environment. This is however evident from the point of view of developing an effective result in order to reduce the damage (Durant and Fiorino, 2017). Conclusion The purpose behind implementing EIA is to manage the resources in the best possible way and analysing the side-effects while carrying out the activities. This is important for generating better opportunities in order to deliver positive result for the people. In a long run, this is taken as a beneficial activity in order to arrange the functions by understanding the facts. This is necessary for managing the impacts the certain activities has on environment. This is important for gaining better opportunities by implementing a plan necessary to organize results. This is important for managing the results in the best effective way to manage the outcome. The rules and regulations related to the compliance functions are directed by the development of resources in best possible way. It is significant from managing the functions in an appropriate way. The Environment Assessment is significant from the point of view of generating awareness and growth in the sector. It is important for managi ng long-term sustainable goals with the effectiveness. It is necessary in defining the applicability of various law and regulations in order to manage the consequences. Nevertheless, it is necessarily to be taken as an effective process to manage the plan in a better way. References Biswas, A.K. and Agarwal, S.B.C. eds., 2013.Environmental impact assessment for developing countries. Elsevier. Darnall, N., Henriques, I. and Sadorsky, P., 2008. Do environmental management systems improve business performance in an international setting?.Journal of International Management,14(4), pp.364-376. Durant, R.F. and Fiorino, D.J., 2017.Environmental governance reconsidered: challenges, choices, and opportunities. MIT Press. Environmental Impact Assessment Improvement Project - Community feedback. 2017. Online. Available at: https://www.planning.nsw.gov.au/Policy-and-Legislation/Under-review-and-new-Policy-and-Legislation/Environmental-Impact-Assessment-Improvement-Project/Community-feedback Accessed on: 5 November 2017 Environmental Impact Assessment Improvement Project. 2017. Online. Available at: https://www.planning.nsw.gov.au/Policy-and-Legislation/Under-review-and-new-Policy-and-Legislation/Environmental-Impact-Assessment-Improvement-Project Accessed on: 5 November 2017 Environmental Impact Assessments, 2017. Online. Available at: https://www.planningportal.nsw.gov.au/lodge-track-applications/lodge-your-application-or-certificate/lodge-your-application-department-0 Accessed on: 5 November 2017 Glasson, J., Therivel, R. and Chadwick, A., 2013.Introduction to environmental impact assessment. Routledge. Gregory, R., Failing, L., Harstone, M., Long, G., McDaniels, T. and Ohlson, D., 2012.Structured decision making: a practical guide to environmental management choices. John Wiley Sons. Jordan, A. and Lenschow, A. eds., 2009.Innovation in environmental policy?: integrating the environment for sustainability. Edward Elgar Publishing. Lehmann, J. and Joseph, S. eds., 2015.Biochar for environmental management: science, technology and implementation. Routledge. Middle, G. and Middle, I., 2010. A review of the use of environmental offset as a policy mechanism in the environmental impact assessment process (EIA) in Western Australia.Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal,28(4), pp.313-322. Mitchell, B., 2013.Resource environmental management. Routledge. Morgan, R.K., 2012. Environmental impact assessment: the state of the art.Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal,30(1), pp.5-14. Petts, J. ed., 2009.Handbook of Environmental Impact Assessment: Volume 2: Impact and Limitations(Vol. 2). John Wiley Sons. Reed, M.S., 2008. Stakeholder participation for environmental management: a literature review.Biological conservation,141(10), pp.2417-2431. Wathern, P. ed., 2013.Environmental impact assessment: theory and practice. Routledge.