Metropolitan Governance and Strategic Planning †MyAssignmenthelp

Question: Discuss about the Metropolitan Governance and Strategic Planning. Answer: Introduction The paper discussed about the governance and management for principal urban regions of Australia. Here, argument includes major reforms of metropolitan governance where the governance is among the scholars, policy makers, professionals of the urban areas and the general republic (Ahrend et al., 2014). The premises include the urban governance failures which manifest threats to the sustainability, and the security with global economic instability and the climatic changes. The shift is stronger with explicit metropolitan governance. Our focus is to evaluate the case of decision making in Australia where the emphasis is terms as government deficit with effective institutional arrangements for planning of urban development and coordinating the services like infrastructure. For the cities to work on different types of production, servicing, marketing and innovation, it becomes important for them to shift form manufacturing to service-based economy. This will increase the rate of flux with capital movement in the states. It also helps in governing cities to be entrepreneurial and concerned with attracting and retaining investments which include the globalised translation companies and their employees. As per the history of Melbourne, it is indicated that there is a need to evaluate the case for re-instating the integrated land use planning which is important for distinctive social, environmental and the economic challenges (Buxton et al., 2016). Considering the issues related to strategy planning, there is a disjuncture between the planning goals and the realities. It includes the codified system for regulating and then approving the use of land for better development. the planning can be either regulatory or facilitative which has been designed for public interest or for transferring the power to the individuals. The frameworks are defined for land use planning system (Flyvbery, 2002). Here, the planning strategy looks for achieving the desirable future outcomes which can create path dependencies to determine the ways of living. The example is the priority given to the infrastructure of road over the investments mainly where public transport infrastructure abides reliance on the cars with expanding investments in roadways. The planning decisions can help in creating path dependencies which could be for determining the living for decades to come and focus on continuing priority for the road infrastructure over investment (UN Sustainable Development Goals Victorian State Government, 2017) Strategic urban planning The strategic planning is a continuous process set through time which includes the shaping of cities, towns and the proper management development, infrastructure and the services. A proper balance is set with environment and natural standards to meet the needs of community with cultural significance (Gupta et al., 2015). The planning is depending upon providing opportunities for better structure with guiding development investments and protecting the values related to urban characteristics. The issues in the planning comes with the sustainable, growth and development, diversified population and better infrastructure and transportation. The major purpose of the planning is to involve the contexts and histories, with government functions, role of planners and their perception. For urban planning, the theories are defined to inform practice which could be accumulated through the practice knowledge which comes from practitioners (Thampson Maginn, 2012). The theories are depending upon conflicting pressures which include place of work, location, profession body and education. Apart from this: The economic planning is the technocratic exercise for economic management. The physical development planning which includes the building of land regulations like the property rights, zoning and the other master plans (Trundle, 2016). The policy analysis and the planning are effective with efficient public administration. This is based on the scientific analysis with de-politics planning. The Planning and Environment Act 1987 is to enable the range of strategic and statutory documents with focus on planning the use, development and land protection. Prevailing justifications The justifications are based on system approaches to plan about system thinking, complexity and connectivity. The planning is based on handling the normative approaches which includes the social principles and the target goals. The collaborative and the consultative approach to planning is based on comprehensive planning (Henderson, 2016). The challenges are based on understanding the strength, application, limitations and the complexities (Lowei, 2018). Hence, the challenge to integrate is important for community engagement and handle the stronger principles with rigorous evidence bases and analysis. The planning is about creating a better and a sustainable world with political agendas and the stakeholder engagement. The metropolitan regions are mainly to handle the infrastructure provision, service delivery and the local or regional governance (Harrison Hoyler, 2014). Here, the local government is relatively working on the leading policy roles across the different cross-functional areas which are considered under the province of state like education or the health and development. The roles and responsibility are to work on detachment which is important to safeguard against the egregious governance failures which includes ad-hoc and reactive decision making which comprise of policy objectives (UN Habitat, 2007). The strategic planning is based on predicting and providing manner with making decisions depending upon path dependency. Here, strategic spatial planning implies different public benefits that only government can deliver along with requiring a proper coordination, integration and intervention from the government. For the federal Government: The roles and responsibilities include contribution to infrastructure funding like roads. The policy statements include National Urban Policy Framework (2011) and the Smart Cities Plan (2016). For the State Government: The responsibilities for the planning system includes the strategic and the statutory part with focus on land, water and planning the energy with environment (Healey, 2009). The local government needs to focus on the decision making with the public health, management of the council property and the environment changes. The assets and the infrastructure management also need to be checked like the roads, public lighting etc (Buxton et al., 2016). The issues are related to frequent changes in weather events like the cyclones, floods etc. The increased temperature and the sea level could be the major issues. Address key urban issues and challenges There are major implications on the biodiversity, use of water, energy, food, pollution and the change in climate. The water impacts could be the access to the water demands is subjected to increase by 55% from demands which are related to urbanisation (Searle Bunker, 2010). There is a need of land and water area for maintaining the sustainability to provide energy, water, food and other materials. The planning is important for the government with auditing and regulating the actions related to governance. The changes are recognized with enabling the rapid spread of things with neo-liberalism that it entails. The changes to western government is associated to government who should intervene a little in the operations of free market. There are other implications of neo-liberalism with public sector expenditure, taxation or the indebtedness (Stilwell Troy, 2000). The competitiveness tenders for different government tasks, with removal of constraints on market, which is done through the deregulation process of labour market and financial systems. References Ahrend, R., Gamper, C. and Schumann, A., 2014. The OECD Metropolitan Governance Survey: A quantitative description of governance structures in large urban agglomerations.OECD Regional Development Working Papers,2014(4), p.0_1. Daley, J., Coates, B. and Wiltshire, T., 2017. Submission to the NSW Legislative Assembly Committee on Environment and Planning Inquiry into Land Release and Housing Supply in NSW. Flyvbjerg, B., 2002. Bringing power to planning research: one researchers praxis story.Journal of planning education and research,21(4), pp.353-366 Goodman, R., Buxton, M. and Moloney, S., 2016.Planning Melbourne: lessons for a sustainable city. CSIRO PUBLISHING. Gupta, J., Verrest, H. and Jaffe, R., 2015. Theorizing governance. InGeographies of Urban Governance(pp. 27-43). Springer, Cham. Harrison, J. Hoyler, M. 2014. Governing the new metropolis,Urban Studies, 51(11), pp. 2249-2266 https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals Henderson H., 2016. Habitat III: the biggest conference youve probably never heardof https://theconversation.com/habitat-iii-the-biggest-conference-youve-probably-never-heard-of-63499 Lowei M., 2018. This is why health has to be at the heart of the New UrbanAgendahttps://theconversation.com/this-is-why-health-has-to-be-at-the-heart-of-the-new-urban-agenda-91009?utm_content=bufferaa52eutm_medium=socialutm_source=facebook.comutm_campaign=buffer Searle, G. and Bunker, R., 2010. Metropolitan strategic planning: An Australian paradigm?.Planning Theory,9(3), pp.163-180. Shen, L.Y., Ochoa, J.J., Shah, M.N. and Zhang, X., 2011. The application of urban sustainability indicatorsA comparison between various practices.Habitat International,35(1), pp.17-29. Stilwell, F. and Troy, P., 2000. Multilevel governance and urban development in Australia.Urban Studies,37(5-6), pp.909-930. Thompson, S. and Maginn, P., 2012.Planning Australia: An overview of urban and regional planning. Cambridge University Press. Trundle, A., 2016. Habitat III is over, but will its New Urban Agenda transform the worldscities? https://theconversation.com/habitat-iii-is-over-but-will-its-new-urban-agenda-transform-the-worlds-cities-67432